And why it is our calling
by Ruby Dilts
Every four years, Americans seem to echo a repeating chorus: “I’ve never seen this country so divided.” Yet every four years, Americans continue to weaponize word
and deed in a manner that deepens that division. When the world engages in polarized
debate, believers should not, must not, follow suit.
The Bible calls on Christians to live differently than those who don’t profess faith
in Christ. Christians must be aware of their rhetoric when engaging in political discussion in order to do so in a Christlike manner.
We see this guidance in scripture that urges us to ground ourselves in something more profound than elections. Romans 12:2 says:
“Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve
what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.”
When Christians conform to the same behaviors as non believers, much is lost. It is wise for individuals to research political candidates in order to formulate opinions and vote in an informed manner.
What is not wise, though, is to use personal views as an excuse for slandering candidates. Good stewardship of readily available information can lead to strong personal opinions. This is not necessarily detrimental to society or the church, but when these strong opinions give way to degrading commentary, an issue arises.
Individuals notice when believers act in ways contrary to scripture, earning the church a reputation for being hypocritical. Rather than partaking in harsh debate,
believers have an opportunity to walk in a renewed, Christlike manner when discussing
political candidates and upcoming elections.
On October 10, 2008, America saw a clear example of civilized political rhetoric and persuasion. . .and decency. Republican John McCain sought his second presidential bid. At a town hall in Lakeville, Minnesota, he did more than just campaign on points popular within his own party; he explored unpopular topics and welcomed debate. He demonstrated what
it looks like to engage in political commentary wisely.
An individual in attendance made a comment about Barack Obama, McCain’s opponent.
“He’s an Arab,” she referred to the former president.
“No ma’am,” McCain responded, “he’s a decent family man, citizen, that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues, and that’s what this campaign is all about,” McCain said. The next day, Obama thanked McCain for his defense.
“I appreciated his reminder that we can disagree while still being respectful of each other,” Obama said.
McCain and Obama showed America what it looks like to cross the aisle in a way that holds true to party values while also respecting personhood.
Again, we see support of this in scripture. John 13:35 says:
“By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love
one another.”
Do we practice this, though? A common misconception seems to be that love is characterized by an acceptance or celebration of all ideologies, beliefs or lifestyles. Jesus Christ lived in a manner that displayed true love – a love very different than what many seek today. Jesus did not celebrate all actions. Often, after sharing a transformational experience with an individual, he commanded the person to go and sin no more. He was full of love, choosing to die for humanity, knowing many would turn from him. His love didn’t look like an acceptance of all ideas. Instead, he offered grace and compassion to many.
When discussing political matters, believers must do so with love. This does not mean that believers must celebrate every candidate or every policy. It does mean that
believers should extend grace and kindness, just as Jesus did.
It seems that upcoming elections cause Americans to forget the art of disagreeing peaceably. Christians have an opportunity to shift the pendulum, though. Believers ought to engage in political discussion in a different way than non believers.
This pursuit of calm objectivity does not negate Christlike love. This love is necessary in
any attempt to partake in political discussion in a manner that demonstrates the
renewed habits of a believer.
